Fed trading scandal rekindled by disclosure from top official


Richard Clarida, the vice-chair of the Federal Reserve, has blamed “inadvertent errors” for failing to disclose the full extent of his trading activity at the start of the pandemic, threatening to reignite an ethics scandal at the US central bank.

New disclosures reveal that Clarida — already under fire for making trades as the Fed was plotting emergency support for the economy — was more active in financial markets than he originally divulged.

Clarida, the Fed’s second-in-command, had previously disclosed that he moved between $1m and $5m from a bond fund into a stock fund on February 27, 2020. Those trades were controversial because they were made just a day before Jay Powell, chair of the central bank, signalled the Fed was preparing emergency measures to support the economy.

However, amended disclosures, released by the Fed last month, show that three days prior to the already-reported transactions, Clarida sold between $1m and $5m of shares from the same stock fund. The updated disclosures were first reported by The New York Times.

The revelations are the latest development in a saga that has already forced the departure of two regional Fed presidents while prompting a sweeping overhaul of trading rules for top officials.

“This demonstrates not only a breakdown in the ethical decision making of a senior policymaker, but in the very procedures and controls meant to monitor these policymakers,” said Kaleb Nygaard, a senior research associate at Yale’s Program on Financial Stability and a former Fed staffer.

Nygaard added: “The nature of scandals like this is that the damage only increases with every day that the public doesn’t hear the full story and how the Fed plans to fix it.”

When Clarida’s dealings came to light in October, a Fed spokesperson said they were part of a “pre-planned rebalancing” and had prior approval from the central bank’s ethics office.

Norman Eisen, an ethics adviser to the Obama administration who is at the Brookings Institution, said the latest disclosure “calls into question” the initial explanation of Clarida’s trades. He added it was “incumbent” on the outgoing vice-chair to provide more information about the transactions.

“Frankly, I don’t understand how selling out of a fund, failing to disclose that, then buying the same fund again, all while making a profit and having sensitive Fed information, constitutes a ‘rebalancing,’ so it’s absolutely necessary that he explain that rationale,” he said.

The trading scandal that first erupted in September generated widespread scrutiny and prompted Elizabeth Warren, the progressive Democrat from Massachusetts, to demand that the Securities and Exchange Commission launch an investigation into transactions that “reflect[ed] atrocious judgment”.

An independent government watchdog overseeing the central bank subsequently opened an investigation.

Two regional Fed presidents, Eric Rosengren of Boston and Robert Kaplan of Dallas, resigned from their positions after they were found to have repeatedly bought and sold individual stocks and held stakes in several investment funds last year.

Kaplan disclosed holdings worth more than $1m in 27 publicly traded companies, funds and alternative investments, including iPhone maker Apple, Chinese ecommerce group Alibaba, electric vehicle manufacturer Tesla and telecoms group Verizon. Rosengren held large stakes in several real estate investment trusts.

In a bid to restore its credibility, the Fed in October announced rules that banned its policymakers and senior staff from buying individual shares, limiting any purchases to diversified investment vehicles like mutual funds.

They also prohibited them from holding investments in individual bonds, agency securities or entering into derivatives contracts, while introducing guidelines on when transactions can take place, how many days’ notice is necessary and how long investments must be held for.

“This new disclosure about Clarida’s trading activity raises more questions about transparency and ethics at the Fed,” said Sarah Blinder, a political scientist at George Washington University. “The public needs to be able to trust that the Fed will actually comply with its own stricter regime.”

The Fed did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday.